Network building, rethought

(I know a) Guy

Someone with a big network - or someone building one?

The instinct is to want people with big networks. It's the wrong instinct - and seeing why is the last thing you need before the whole picture clicks.


You’ve spent this whole series learning to choose who belongs in your network. So here’s a question that sounds like it has an obvious answer - and doesn’t.

Of two people you could build a relationship with, one has a huge network - hundreds of contacts, knows everyone. The other has a modest one, but is clearly the type who will keep growing it, deliberately, for years. Same effort to know either. Which do you want?

The instinct says the big one. More contacts, more doors, more people they can point your way. Obvious.

It’s the wrong instinct, and it’s worth seeing exactly why.

A big network that isn’t growing is a blob. Impressive-looking, yes - but static. Worse, the person sitting on it often believes it’s enough; that having the network is the achievement, that they’ve arrived. All those names, and nothing new ever coming in. When you connect to a blob, you connect to a fixed pool - and a fixed pool gets fished out. You’ll work through the useful introductions in a year, and then it’s just a large, pleasant, going-nowhere acquaintance.

The builder is a completely different kind of asset. Their value isn’t the network they have today - it’s the network they’ll have. And “builder” is a precise word here: not someone who likes networking, someone who systematically builds - who keeps expanding on purpose, the way you now do. Connect to one of those and you haven’t plugged into a fixed pool. You’ve plugged into a growing one.

Look at what that does over time. A builder knows other builders - because builders recognise each other. Two or three genuine builders, each of whom knows two or three more, and the thing rolls forward on its own. It’s expansionary, to borrow a good word - it compounds, where the blob just sits. That’s the whole difference between a network that pays you once and a network that keeps paying.

So the lens flips. Stop weighing people by the size of the network they’ve got. Weigh them by whether they’ll build. A modest network attached to a real builder beats a vast one attached to a blob every single time, because you’re betting on the trajectory, not the snapshot.

And notice what this frees you from. You’re no longer trying to lock anyone in, or angling for an immediate referral, or treating a new relationship as a transaction to close. You’re doing something calmer and far more powerful: looking for builders, and helping them build. Builders who get builders. That’s the entire selection instinct, distilled to one line.

Get that lens right - and you’re ready for the last idea in this series. Because once you’re choosing builders, and they’re choosing builders, a certain picture stops being a nice theory and becomes the obvious, almost inevitable conclusion.

That’s where we’ve been heading the whole time.

New here, or want to see where it's all heading? It's all on one page - start at the map.